JKNPRTNKT
violence, and growing ecological crisis, they will find themselves
is a siginificant contribution in itself. As anarchist movements,
24. From Bakunin to Lacan is overly eager to get from Bakunin to
and through the Symbolic, could reinforce Bookchin's distinction
Zerzan is well aware (116-17)--could be marshaled against the
nfxrfvf pbhyq or hfrq gb arhgenyvmr gur vasyhrapr bs yrsg-Serhqvna
intellectually sterile primitivism of Eugene.
post-1960s theoretical tendencies which regard all structure,
the development of anarchist theory than their example would
"spectres," I would argue that anarchism has more to offer
22. As refreshing as it is to step outside this endless Marxist
driving Marxism further and further in the direction of its old
SNTRLTFKLSKNFLKTPRKRSFKLNLKSTL
world" in favor of some ironic or nihilistic embrace of the world
rather than continually fiddling around with Marxist texts in yet
than mere individualism. "Needless to say," Newman admits in
placed Stirner outside the mainstream of the anarchist
against the notion of community itself" (70), it is hard to avoid the
Indeed, for Stirner, "we have only one relation to each other, that
Indeed, for Stirner, "we have only one relation to each other, that
respected, not even the fellow-man, but solely, like other beings,
"community" which one is "forced" to participate in (70), but this
in common with yours? Newman calls attention to Stirner's
which Newman formulates in his final chapter (157). How can a
20. These important questions remain unresolved. More
not "power" but "domination." Was the quest in vain? Has all of
between the constitutive "law" and the "transgression" it
two antagonists, the "state" which provokes and the "subject"
which Newman cites as evidence of his "essentialism," that.